Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Conley v. Wilkes

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Augusta Division

March 28, 2019




         Plaintiff, an inmate at Augusta State Medical Prison (“ASMP”) in Grovetown, Georgia, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this case filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because he is proceeding IFP, Plaintiff's amended complaint must be screened to protect potential defendants. Phillips v. Mashburn, 746 F.2d 782, 785 (11th Cir. 1984); Al-Amin v. Donald, 165 Fed.Appx. 733, 736 (11th Cir. 2006).


         Plaintiff names as Defendants: (1) Scott Wilkes, Warden; (2) Clifford Brown, Unit Manager; and (3) Officer Robinson. (Doc. no. 14, p. 2.) Taking all of Plaintiff's allegations as true, as the Court must for purposes of the present screening, the facts are as follows.

         On November 6, 2017, Plaintiff was at the Crisis Special Unit (“CSU”) at ASMP. (Id. at 5.) Around 8:00 a.m., Plaintiff was verbally threatened through his cell door by an unknown inmate (“unit worker”) working in the CSU. (Id.) The unit worker told Plaintiff he was going to kill him the first chance he got. (Id.) After being threatened, Plaintiff immediately went to his cell door to inform Officer Robinson. (Id. at 12.) Plaintiff shouted for Officer Robinson, which prompted the unit worker to come back to Plaintiff's cell and call him a snitch. (Id.) Plaintiff then asked the unit worker to leave him alone. (Id.) While speaking to the unit worker, Plaintiff noticed Officer Robinson looking in his direction, and when Officer Robinson and Plaintiff made eye contact, Officer Robinson immediately looked away and disregarded Plaintiff's shouts for help. (Id.) The unit worker then walked away. (Id.)

         A little while later, Officer Robinson came to Plaintiff's cell and asked if he wanted to see the doctor. (Id.) At this time, Plaintiff told Officer Robinson about the threats made by the unit worker. (Id.) Plaintiff begged Officer Robinson to tell Unit Manager Clifford Brown and Chief of Security Captain Collier about the threats. (Id.) Officer Robinson said he would. (Id.) Plaintiff next asked to not leave his cell until his life was not in danger, to which Officer Robinson did not respond and walked away. (Id.)

         Soon after this, Officer Robinson returned, placed Plaintiff in handcuffs, and escorted him out of his cell. (Id. at 13.) While being handcuffed, Plaintiff asked where the unit worker was and if anything had been done about the threats. (Id.) Officer Robinson told Plaintiff not to worry and that he was ok. (Id.) Officer Robinson escorted Plaintiff to the doctor and left Plaintiff alone to wait with his hands still cuffed. (Id.) At this time, Plaintiff was approached by the unit worker. (Id.) The unit worker told Plaintiff he should kill him now, but he walked off. (Id.) Then, Officer Robinson returned and took Plaintiff to the nurse to check his vital signs. (Id.) Plaintiff informed Officer Robinson about what the unit worker said, which Officer Robinson replied “you ain't [sic] hurt yet, you'll be ok.” (Id. at 14.) Officer Robinson also said he spoke to Unit Manager Brown who said he would handle it. (Id.)

         While being escorted back to his cell by Officer Robinson, Plaintiff was attacked by the unit worker. (Id.) During the attack, Officer Robinson ran away and left Plaintiff alone. (Id.) Plaintiff was stabbed fifteen times. (Id.) Eventually, a nurse came to Plaintiff's aid and tried to pull the unit worker off Plaintiff by hitting the unit worker with a chair. (Id.) About eight minutes later, Officer Robinson came back and, along with the nurse, removed the unit worker from Plaintiff. (Id.) Also arriving with Officer Robinson, the Corrections Emergency Response Team (“CERT”) removed the unit worker from the area. (Id.)

         After the attack, Plaintiff overheard Unit Manager Brown tell Warden Wilkes he was notified of the threat but he did not think of it as serious. (Id. at 15.) Plaintiff was taken to the local hospital for treatment of his wounds. (Id.) In addition to multiple stab wounds receiving stitches, Plaintiff suffered from a broken nose and collar bone. (Id.) After two months of treatment, Plaintiff's stitches were removed, and he has not received any follow up treatment. (Id.) Plaintiff also suffers from emotional distress and nightmares from the attack. (Id.)

         Plaintiff alleges all Defendants were deliberately indifferent to his safety. He seeks a declaratory judgment that his Constitutional rights were violated based on the facts as he alleges them, $100, 000 in compensatory damages from each Defendant, an additional $50, 000 in compensatory damages from Warden Wilkes and Officer Robinson, $25, 000 in punitive damages from Officer Robinson and Unit Manager Brown, and $15, 000 in punitive damages from Warden Wilkes. (Id. at 18.)

         Liberally construing Plaintiff's allegations in his favor and granting him the benefit of all reasonable inferences to be derived from the facts alleged, the Court finds Plaintiff has arguably stated a viable Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against Officer Robinson and Unit Manager Clifford Brown. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 824, 834-39 (1994) (“A prison official's ‘deliberate indifference' to a substantial risk of serious harm to an inmate violates the Eighth Amendment.”). Accordingly, process shall issue as to Officer Robinson and Unit Manager Brown. In a companion Report and Recommendation, the Court recommends dismissal of Defendant Warden Wilkes and Plaintiff's claim against Officer Robinson for deliberate indifference by failing to intervene in an inmate-on-inmate assault.


         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that service of process shall be effected on Officer Robinson and Unit Manager Clifford Brown. The United States Marshal shall mail a copy of the amended complaint, (doc. no. 14), and this Order by first-class mail and request that the defendants waive formal service of the summons. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d). Individual defendants have a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons, and if a defendant fails to comply with the request for waiver, the defendant must bear the costs of personal service unless good cause can be shown for failure to return the waiver. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(2). A defendant whose return of the waiver is timely does not have to answer the complaint until sixty days after the date the Marshal mails the request for waiver. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(3). However, service must be effected within ninety days of the date of this Order, and the failure to do so may result in the dismissal of any unserved defendant or the entire case. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Plaintiff is responsible for providing sufficient information for the Marshal to identify and locate the defendant to effect service.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve upon Defendants, or upon their defense attorney if appearance has been entered by counsel, a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted to the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the papers to be filed a certificate stating the date a true and correct copy of any document was mailed to the defendants or their counsel. Fed.R.Civ.P. 5; Loc. R. 5.1. Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the action, and the file number. Fed.R.Civ.P. 10(a). Any paper received by a District Judge ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.