Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dantzler v. Georgia Ports Authority

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division

April 14, 2017

MAKY N. DANTZLER, Plaintiff,
v.
GEORGIA PORTS AUTHORITY, Defendant.

          ORDER

         Plaintiff Mary Dantzler has filed suit against her former employer, the Georgia Ports Authority, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and Rehabilitation Act (RA), 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq. Doc. 6.

         I. BACKGROUND

         Dantzler alleges that she is "disabled" within the meaning of the ADA because "she suffers from Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), a mental impairment which prevents the mind from functioning normally in that it substantially limits [her] ability to sleep, learn, concentrate and think." Id. at 2. Further, she was otherwise qualified for her job, until promoted to a position for which she lacked experience and adequate training. Id. at 2-5. Her repeated requests for training to accommodate her ADD were denied or inadequately met, and as a result she was disproportionately punished with negative performance reviews and ultimately terminated. Id. at 4-12. Plaintiff timely filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and was issued a right to sue notice.[1]

         II. DISCUSSION

         To establish a prima facie case of discrimination under the ADA and the RA, [2] an employee must show that (1) she has a disability within the meaning of the ADA; (2) she is a qualified individual; and (3) she was discriminated against because of her disability.[3] 42 U.S.C. § 12112; 29 U.S.C. § 794; see e.g., Harris v. H & W Contracting Co., 102 F.3d 516, 519 (11th Cir. 1996).

         Plaintiff alleges that (1) she has a "mental impairment" (ADD) (2) that substantially limits one or more of her "major life activities" (learning and working), (3) that she requested specific accommodations be made for her ADD to enable her to perform the requirements of her job (informing her supervisors that she had ADD and needed training and workplace distraction accommodations to be made), and that (4) her employer took adverse employment actions against her because of her disability (she was reprimanded, given negative performance reviews, and terminated). Doc. 2-12; see 42 U.S.C. § 12102; 29 C.F.R. § 1630; 29 U.S.C. § 794. This is enough to survive screening, and warrant a response from defendant.

         III. CONCLUSION

         Plaintiff has pled enough facts for this Court to greenlight service of her Amended Complaint. Hence, the defendant will have to be served with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 process. To that end, the Court will implement the service procedure deployed in Newton v. Food Lion, LLC, CV415-153 doc. 10 (S.D. Ga. Dec 9, 2015) and Simmons v. Five Star Quality Care, Inc., CV414-203, 2014 WL 6603759 at * 4 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 19, 2014), adopted, 2015 WL 307003 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 23, 2015).

         That process unfolds in stages. Since the Court has authorized IFP status, Rule 4 service must be made by the United States Marshals Service. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3) (the court "must" order that service be made by the Marshal "if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed [IFP]"). But the Marshal needs to know where to serve the defendant, and that information must come from the plaintiff. Hence, these preliminary steps are required: The Clerk shall send to plaintiff a USM 285 form and a summons form. Within twenty-one days of that mailing, plaintiff must accurately complete both forms[4] and return them to the Clerk, who will then forward a copy of each form to the defendant. The Clerk is instructed to notify the undersigned if plaintiff fails to comply. Should plaintiff fail to comply, this action may be dismissed for failure to obey a Court order. Local Rule 41.1.

         Should that phase of the Rule 4 service cycle be completed, the Clerk will then prepare a service waiver package for the defendant. Rule 4(d)(1). That package must include: a Rule 4 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons[5] (prepared by the Clerk); two copies of the Waiver of the Service of Summons form (prepared by the Clerk); an envelope addressed to the Clerk of Court with adequate first class postage for use by the defendant for return of the waiver form; one (1) copy of the Complaint; and one (1) copy of this Order. The Clerk shall retain and docket the original USM 285 forms and the summons returned by the plaintiff. See Dunn v. Fed. Express, 2014 WL 1028949 at * 3 (N.D.Ga. Mar. 14, 2104).

         Next, the Clerk shall mail the service waiver package to the defendant. The defendant is under a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of personally serving the summons. If it fails to comply with the mailed request for waiver of service, it must bear the costs of personal service unless good cause can be shown for failure to return the Waiver of Service form. Should the defendant fail to waive service within sixty (60) days following the date the service waiver package was mailed (the Clerk shall docket that act), the Clerk will prepare and transmit to the Marshal a service package. The service package must include the USM 285 form, the summons, and one (1) copy of the Amended Complaint, plus a copy of this Order. The Marshal will then promptly serve the defendant. The executed waiver form or the completed USM 285 form shall be filed with the Clerk. See Dunn, 2014 WL 1028949 at * 2-3.

         Once plaintiffs Amended Complaint is served upon the defendant, she must then serve defendant (through its counsel, if it is represented) with a copy of every additional pleading or other document which she files with the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. She also shall include with each paper so filed a certificate stating the date on which she mailed an accurate copy of that paper to the defendant or its counsel. This Court will disregard any papers submitted which have not been properly filed with the Clerk or which do not include a certificate of service.

         Finally, Dantzler also must keep the Court and any defendant advised of her current address at all times during the pendency of this action. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of her Complaint. She also must litigate this case, conduct and respond to any discovery, and comply with both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.