Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Daniels v. Williams

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division

June 1, 2015

DOUG WILLIAMS, Individually and in his Official Capacity, et al., Defendants.


BRIAN K. EPPS, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated at Dodge State Prison in Chester, Georgia, commenced the above-captioned case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. Because he is proceeding in forma pauperis ("IFP"), Plaintiff's amended complaint must be screened to protect potential defendants. Phillips v. Mashburn, 746 F.2d 782, 785 (11th Cir. 1984); Al-Amin v. Donald, 165 F.Appx. 733, 736 (11th Cir. 2006).



In his complaint, Plaintiff names as Defendants: (1) Doug Williams, Warden (2) Tina Sanders, Deputy Warden of Care and Treatment; (3) Augusta Inman, Deputy Warden of Security; and (4) Lieutenant Strong. (Doc. no. 15, pp. 1, 4.) Taking all of Plaintiff's factual allegations as true, as the Court must for purposes of the present screening, the facts are as follows.

On May 15, 2014, several inmates assaulted Plaintiff with combination locks. (Id. at 3.) As a result of the injuries from the altercation, Plaintiff bled profusely from head wounds, suffered from dizziness, and was in pain. (Id.) After the altercation, Lieutenant Strong and his subordinates escorted Plaintiff to the medical department where they gave him paper towels and placed his head under running water, causing pain to the wounds located there. (Id.) This was done without the presence of medical staff. (Id.) Lieutenant Strong then took pictures of the wounds, walked Plaintiff to segregation, and placed him in the shower, disregarding Plaintiff's complaints of pain and dizziness. (Id.) The officers then told Plaintiff to strip off his clothes because they were covered in blood. (Id.) Plaintiff continued to complain of pain and dizziness to which Lieutenant Strong responded by directing the officers to give Plaintiff tylenol. (Id.) Plaintiff was then placed in a cell with another inmate who wrapped Plaintiff's head with tissue and paper towels to prevent the wounds from bleeding. (Id.) The next afternoon, Plaintiff was taken to the hospital where he received several staples to close the lacerations on his head. (Id.) Plaintiff requests injunctive relief to ensure that Defendants comply with the proper medical protocols at the prison. (Id. at 5.) Plaintiff also requests compensatory and punitive damages. (Id.)

Liberally construing Plaintiff's allegations in his favor and granting him the benefit of all reasonable inferences to be derived from the facts alleged, the Court finds that Plaintiff has arguably stated a claim for deliberate indifference against Lieutenant Strong for a delay in medical treatment. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834-39; Brown v. Hughes, 894 F.2d 1533, 1538 (11th Cir. 1990) (finding a six hour delay in treatment for a broken foot was sufficient to state a constitutional claim). In a companion Report and Recommendation, the Court recommends dismissal of Defendants Williams, Sanders, and Inman.


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that service of process shall be effected on Defendant Lieutenant Strong. The United States Marshal shall mail a copy of the complaint (doc. no. 1) and this Order by first-class mail and request that the defendant waive formal service of the summons. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d). Individual defendants have a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons, and if a defendant fails to comply with the request for waiver, the defendant must bear the costs of personal service unless good cause can be shown for failure to return the waiver. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(2). A defendant whose return of the waiver is timely does not have to answer the complaint until sixty days after the date the Marshal mails the request for waiver. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(3). However, service must be effected within 120 days of the date of this Order, and the failure to do so may result in the dismissal of any unserved defendant. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Plaintiff is responsible for providing sufficient information for the Marshal to identify and locate the defendants to effect service.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve upon the defendant, or upon his defense attorney if appearance has been entered by counsel, a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted to the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the papers to be filed a certificate stating the date a true and correct copy of any document was mailed to the defendants or their counsel. Fed.R.Civ.P. 5; Loc. R. 5.1. Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the action, and the file number. Fed.R.Civ.P. 10(a). Any paper received by a District Judge or Magistrate Judge that has not been properly filed with the Clerk of Court or that fails to include a caption or certificate of service will be returned.

It is Plaintiff's duty to cooperate fully in any discovery that may be initiated by the defendant. Upon being given at least five days notice of the scheduled deposition date, Plaintiff shall appear and permit his deposition to be taken and shall answer, under oath and solemn affirmation, any question that seeks information relevant to the subject matter of the pending action. Failing to answer questions at the deposition or giving evasive or incomplete responses to questions will not be tolerated and may subject Plaintiff to severe sanctions, including dismissal of this case. The defendant shall ensure that Plaintiff's deposition and any other depositions in the case are taken within the 140-day discovery period allowed by this Court's Local Rules.

While this action is pending, Plaintiff shall immediately inform this Court and opposing counsel of any change of address. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case.

Plaintiff must pursue this case; if Plaintiff does not press the case forward, the Court may dismiss it for want of prosecution. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41; Loc. R. 41.1. If Plaintiff wishes to obtain facts and information about the case from the defendant, Plaintiff must initiate discovery. See generally Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 through 37 (containing the rules governing discovery and providing for the basic methods of discovery). Plaintiff should begin discovery promptly and complete it within four months after the filing of the last answer of a defendant named in the amended complaint screened herein.

Interrogatories are a practical method of discovery for pro se litigants. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 33. Interrogatories shall not contain more than twenty-five questions. Id . Plaintiff must have the Court's permission to propound more than one set of interrogatories to a party. Discovery materials should not be filed routinely with the Clerk of the Court; exceptions include when the Court directs filing; when a party needs such materials in connection with a motion or response, and then only to the extent necessary; and when needed for use at trial. If Plaintiff wishes to file a motion to compel pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, he should first contact the attorney for the defendant and try to work out the problem; if Plaintiff ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.