Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Grant v. Target Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division

January 30, 2015

CHARITY GRANT, Plaintiffs,
v.
TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant.

ORDER

G.R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.

In this slip-and-fall case defendant moves to compel plaintiff to undergo a Fed.R.Civ.P. 35 independent medical examination to corroborate her claim that she suffers from severe back pain as a result of the incident giving rise to her suit. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff insists that she already underwent an independent medical examination in 2012, during the pendency of a prior state court action that she later dismissed without prejudice and refiled in 2014. (Doe. 15-1 at 2-3.) Plaintiff also points out, however, that defendant failed to submit a certification showing that the parties conferred in a good faith effort to resolve the dispute before coming to Court. ( Id. at 5.)

Local Rule 26.5(c) reminds attorneys "that Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) and 37(a)(2) require a party seeking a protective order or moving to compel discovery to certify that a good faith effort has been made to resolve the dispute before coming to court." "That rule is enforced." Hernandez v. Hendrix Produce, Inc., 2014 WL 953503 at *1 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 10, 2014). And the conference must be meaningful. Hernandez v. Hendrix Produce, Inc., 297 F.R.D. 538, 540 (S.D. Ga. 2014). Since no certification was provided, defendant's motion to compel a medical examination (doc. 14) is DENIED as premature.

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.