Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ezzard v. Ajibade

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division

January 7, 2015

STEVE H. EZZARD, Plaintiff,
v.
DR. AJIBADE and WARDEN BRAD HOOKS, Defendants.

ORDER

DUDLEY H. BOWEN, District Judge.

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed (doc. no. 25). Nothing in Plaintiff's objections undermines the Magistrate Judge's analysis that Plaintiff fails to satisfy the four prerequisites for obtaining injunctive relief The Court also notes that Plaintiff's declaration in his objections that he has made the Magistrate Judge a Defendant is both procedurally and substantively improper. See Rehberg v. Paulk, 132 S.Ct. 1497, 1503 (2012) (listing "functions that are absolutely immune from liability for damages under ยง 1983, " including "actions taken by judges within the legitimate scope of judicial authority"); Fed.R.Civ.P. 15 (explaining rules for filing a motion to amend). Therefore, Plaintiff's declaration does not change the fact that there are currently only two defendants in this case, and they are both listed in the caption above.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion and DENIES Plaintiff's motions for an emergency injunction. (Doc. nos. 17, 19.)

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.