United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Steven E. Slawson, Defendant, Pro se, Lebanon, NJ.
For Steven E. Slawson, Defendant: Todd Harrison, LEAD ATTORNEY, PRO HAC VICE, McDermott Will & Emery - NY, NY, New York, NY; Tony Glen Powers, Rogers & Hardin, LLP, Atlanta, GA.
For USA, Plaintiff: David M. Chaiken, Stephen H. McClain, LEAD ATTORNEYS, U.S. Attorneys Office - ATL, Atlanta, GA.
ORDER FOR SERVICE OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JANET F. KING, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
Attached is the Report and Recommendation (" R& R") of the United States Magistrate Judge made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and N.D.Ga. CrR. 58.1(A)(3)(a), (b). Let the same be filed and a copy of the R& R, together with a copy of this Order, be served upon counsel for the parties.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), each party may file written objections to the R& R within fourteen (14) days of service of this Order. Should objections be filed, they shall specify with particularity the alleged error(s) made (including reference by page number to the transcript if applicable) and shall be served upon the opposing party. See United States v. Gaddy, 894 F.2d 1307, 1315 (11th Cir. 1990). The party filing objections will be responsible for obtaining and filing the transcript of any evidentiary hearing for review by the District Court. Failure to object in accordance with this rule waives a party's right to review. Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2).
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(H), the above-referenced fourteen (14) days allowed for filing objections is EXCLUDED from the computation of time under the Speedy Trial Act (" the Act"), whether or not objections are actually filed. If objections to this R& R are filed, the Clerk is DIRECTED to EXCLUDE from the computation of time all time between the filing of the R& R and the submission of the R& R, along with any objections, responses and replies thereto, to the District Judge. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D), (H); Henderson v. United States, 476 U.S. 321, 331, 106 S.Ct. 1871, 90 L.Ed.2d 299 (1986); United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d ...