Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jones v. Bank of America Corp.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Columbus Division

September 10, 2014

JEFFREY JAY JONES and SANDRA D. JONES, Individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA CORP., Defendant.

ORDER

W. LOUIS SANDS, District Judge.

Before the Court are Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 50) and Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate Cases. (Doc. 57.)

On November 27, 2013 this Court found that Plaintiffs are not the real parties in interest under O.C.G.A. Section 44-14-3, the statute under which they seek damages. (Doc. 69 at 3.) The Court concluded that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 50) should be granted but stayed the above-styled action for forty-five (45) days to allow Plaintiffs to seek ratification, joinder, or substitution of the real party in interest-the current property owner of the home the Joneses once owned in Columbus, Georgia. (Doc. 69 at 8.) Now, after nearly ten months and four additional Orders staying the proceedings, the Plaintiffs have failed to seek ratification, joinder, or substitution of the real party in interest in their claim ( See Docket; Docs. 73, 76, 78, 80.) For the reasons set forth in this Court's November 27, 2013 Order (Doc. 69), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

On August 5, 2013 Plaintiffs moved to consolidate this case with Schorr v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., No. 4:07-cv-00019-WLS and to add Lori and Bradley Schorr as plaintiffs and putative class representatives in this case and Bank of America, N.A. as a defendant in the Schorr action. (Doc. 57.) In a January 13, 2014 brief in response to this Court's November 27, 2013 Order, Plaintiffs repeated their arguments in support of consolidation and urged the Court to consolidate the cases and find Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss moot. (Doc. 70.)

The Court agrees with Defendant that consolidation cannot cure defective standing in this case. (Doc. 62 at 6-8.) "Consolidation does not result in a merger of suits or parties such that federal jurisdiction in one case can be engrafted upon a case with which it is consolidated. Each suit must have an independent jurisdictional basis." Xaros v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 820 F.2d 1176, 1180 n.1 (11th Cir. 1987) (citing Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co., 289 U.S. 479 (1993)). The Joneses are not the real party in interest in their claim under O.C.G.A. Section 9-11-17 and neither would the Schorrs be if they were added as plaintiffs and putative class representatives in this case. Furthermore, having granted Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, the Court finds that Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate and add the Schorrs as plaintiffs is now moot.

Additionally, Plaintiffs' Motion to Join Bank of America, N.A. as a defendant in the Schorr case is improperly filed in this action. (Doc. 57 at 8.) Should any of the Parties in Schorr seek joinder of Bank of America, N.A., a motion to join should be filed in that action. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 19 and 20.

For the reasons set forth above and in this Court's November 27, 2013 Order (Doc. 69), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Furthermore, for the reasons set forth herein, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.