Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Malloy v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

September 9, 2014

MALLOY
v.
THE STATE

Cert. applied for.

Bond. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Becker.

Garland, Samuel & Loeb, Donald F. Samuel, Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, Brian F. McEvoy, for appellant.

Robert D. James, Jr., District Attorney, Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Nancy B. Allstrom, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Phipps, C. J., concurs. McMillian, J., concurs in judgment only.

OPINION

Page 502

Ellington, Presiding Judge.

In the Superior Court of DeKalb County, a jury found Dr. Tyrone Malloy guilty of two counts of Medicaid fraud[1] and

Page 503

the court sentenced him to serve four years in prison. Prior to filing his motion for [329 Ga.App. 39] a new trial, Malloy sought an appeal bond, which the court denied following a hearing. Malloy appeals from the order denying bond,[2] contending that he presented sufficient evidence demonstrating that he was not a flight risk. For the following reasons, we affirm.

1. " There is no constitutional right to bond pending appeal. Whether to grant an appeal bond to eligible[[3]] felony defendants lies within the sound discretion of the convicting court, and we will not disturb the court's decision absent a flagrant abuse of discretion." (Footnotes omitted.) Luke v. State, 282 Ga.App. 749, 750 (639 S.E.2d 645) (2006).

In exercising its discretion, the trial court must answer four questions: (1) whether there is a substantial risk the defendant will flee; (2) whether there is a substantial risk the defendant will pose a danger to others in the community; (3) whether there is a substantial risk the defendant will intimidate witnesses or otherwise interfere with the administration of justice; and (4) whether it appears the appeal is frivolous or taken only for the purpose of delay. An affirmative answer to any one of these questions will support the trial court's decision to deny an appeal bond.

(Footnotes omitted.) Abernathy v. State, 245 Ga.App. 857, 857-858 (539 S.E.2d 203) (2000); see also Birge v. State, 238 Ga. 88 (230 S.E.2d 895) (1976).

The defendant bears the burden of persuading the court to grant an appeal bond, and the court should not grant bond " unless the defendant presents sufficient information, evidence, or argument to convince the trial court that none of the four factors applies." (Footnote omitted.) Abernathy v. State, 245 Ga.App. at 858. See also Moore v. State, 151 Ga.App. 413, 414 (260 S.E.2d 350) (1979) (accord). In addition to any evidence offered by the defendant, " the trial judge may consider all the evidence adduced at the trial that is pertinent to [the appeal bond] determination[.]" (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Williford v. State, 218 Ga.App. 522, 523 (462 S.E.2d 632) (1995). " Whether we agree with [the trial court's] findings and conclusions is not controlling." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Hardy v. State, 192 Ga.App. 860, 861 (2) (386 S.E.2d 731) (1989) ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.