Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Holmes v. Margaret's Key, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Brunswick Division

August 20, 2014

MEGAN HOLMES, Individually and As Administrator of the Estate of Cathy Jo Holmes Plaintiff,


LISA GODBEY WOOD, District Judge.

After extensive and repeated notice to Defendant Margaret's Key, LLC and its registered agent Carl M. Drury, III, the Court conducted a hearing on July 10, 2014 to determine default damages. The purpose of this Order is to set forth the damages award Margaret's Key, LLC owes to Plaintiff.


Plaintiff filed the Complaint on July 8, 2011. (Dkt. No. 1). The Complaint alleges federal and state causes of action against the United States, Joseph Parker, and Margaret's Key, LLC arising from the death of Cathy Jo Holmes.

Margaret's Key, LLC was served with the Complaint, and such service was acknowledged on the record on October 17, 2011. (Dkt. No. 20). Margaret's Key, LLC filed an answer on October 17, 2011 through its attorney, B. Reid Zeh, III. The Answer was verified by Carl M. Drury, III on behalf of Margaret's Key, LLC. (Dkt. No. 21). On November 2, 2011, Zeh filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Margaret's Key, LLC. (Dkt. No. 22). In the Motion, Zeh avers that the registered agent for Margaret's Key, LLC is "in the process of hiring other counsel." (Id.)

On January 27, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike Margaret's Key, LLC's Answer for its complete failure to respond to any and all discovery requests. (Dkt. No. 28).

On January 30, 2012, Zeh's Motion to Withdraw was granted. (Dkt. No. 29). Margaret's Key, LLC was Ordered to retain counsel and have counsel file an appearance within 30 days of January 30, 2012. Both Zeh and Drury were given notice of the Order.

Margaret's Key, LLC failed to follow, respond, or object to both the Motion to Strike and the Court's Order to engage counsel. Instead of striking the Answer for the repeated failures, the Court, by Order dated March 13, 2012, allowed Margaret's Key, LLC another opportunity to comply and warned it that failure to respond to the Motion to Strike would indicate that there is no opposition to the Motion. (Dkt. No. 34). No opposition was filed. As a result, on April 12, 2012, the Magistrate Judge recommended striking the Answer pursuant to Rule 37(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because "Margaret's Key, LLC has completely disregarded this Court's instruction subsequent to Zeh's withdrawal and has exhibited an apparent indifference to this litigation." (Dkt. No. 35).

Margaret's Key, LLC did not object to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. As a result of the consistent pattern of failure - failure to respond to discovery, failure to comply with the Court Orders, failure to oppose striking the Answer - the Court Ordered that Margaret's Key, LLC's Answer be stricken. (Dkt. No. 42).[1] The Entry of Default was signed by the Clerk on June 6, 2012. (Dkt. No. 44).

The case was stayed during Parker's bankruptcy proceedings. On April 8, 2014, following the lifting of the bankruptcy stay, a trial notice was sent to all parties including Margaret's Key, LLC. On April 11, 2014, the trial notice sent by the Clerk to the last address for Margaret's Key, LLC given by Margaret's Key, LLC was returned as "undeliverable." Thereafter, on May 20, 2014, the Clerk sent a notice of trial and hearing on damages to Margaret's Key, LLC at every address any party had ever heard of for Margaret's Key, LLC and Carl M. Drury, III. In response, Margaret's Key, LLC did what it has consistently done - nothing.


A defendant in default is deemed to admit the plaintiff's well-pleaded allegations of fact, but is not held to admit facts that are not well-pleaded or to admit conclusions of law. S.E.C. v. Wright , 261 F.App'x 259, 261-62 (11th Cir. 2008) (quoting Nishimatsu Constr. Co. v. Houston Nat'l Bank , 515 F.2d 1200, 1206 (5th Cir. 1975) (internal punctuation omitted). Before entering a default judgment for damages, the court must ensure that the well-pleaded allegations in the complaint, which are taken as true due to the default, actually state a substantive cause of action and that there is a substantive, sufficient basis in the pleadings for the particular relief sought. Cotton v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co. , 402 F.3d 1267, 1278 (11th Cir. 2005). However, since the entry of default does not constitute an admission of conclusions of law, the court is still charged with determining whether the unchallenged facts actually constitute a legitimate cause of action. In considering any default judgment, the court must examine (1) jurisdiction, (2) liability, and (3) damages. See Pitts v. Seneca Sports, Inc. , 321 F.Supp.2d 1353, 1356 (S.D. Ga. 2004). With these considerations in mind, the court evaluates jurisdiction, liability, and damages. This Court has jurisdiction as federal causes of action and supplemental state causes of action are raised.

Liability is properly established as well. Margaret's Key, LLC is a Georgia Limited Liability Company that - at least in July of 2009 - owned an island named Raccoon Key in Glynn County, Georgia. As the owner of the premises, Margaret's Key, LLC hosted a party and provided large quantities of alcohol and drugs to the party goers with knowledge that they would soon be operating a boat on navigable waters.

Joseph Parker and Cathy Holmes both attended the Margaret's Key, LLC party. They left the party in Parker's boat in the early morning hours of July 12, 2009. The boat crashed and Cathy Holmes died. Although it is unclear who was driving the boat at the time of the crash. Plaintiff has adequately shown that Margaret's Key, LLC is liable for providing excessive alcohol and drugs on ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.